Juridical Analysis of the Use of Deed Under Hand as the Basis for Making PKR Deed in the Form of Authentic Deed by Notary in the Conception of Legal Certainty

Authors

  • Ni Made Arnita SARI Warmadewa University
  • Johannes Ibrahim KOSASIH Warmadewa University
  • Anak Agung Istri AGUNG Warmadewa University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/jpls.v3i3.345

Keywords:

Authentic Deed, Private Deed, Notary, Legal Certainty, PKR

Abstract

Purpose:
This study aims to juridically examine the suitability of using deeds under the hand as a legal basis in notarial practice and analyze the form of notary liability in the context of legal certainty.
Methodology:
The method used is normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Data was collected through a literature study, interviews with five notaries, and analysis of three concrete cases, including case No. 616 K/PK/Pdt/2023.
Findings:
The results show that although the use of handwritten documents is still often encountered in practice, notaries are obliged to ensure the validity of the contents and identity of the parties before being stated in the authentic deed. Legal responsibility is attached to the notary both civilly, administratively, and criminally if there is an error or dispute due to the deed made. The unclear norms regarding the limits of the use of underhand documents show the need for legal clarity so that the deed made remains valid, strong, and does not cause legal loopholes.
Implication
Therefore, there is a need for legal reform to create clarity of norms regarding the limits of the use of underhand documents so that the deed made remains valid, strong, and does not cause legal gaps.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adjie, H. (2011). Indonesian Notary Law: Thematic Interpretation of the Notary Position Law. Refika Aditama.

Ahmad, N. A., & Miru, A. (2023). Legal Consequences of Canceling a Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement by Heirs Due to Default. El-Iqthisady: Journal of Sharia Economic Law, 132–142.

Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Legal Protection for the People of Indonesia. Bina Ilmu.

Harahap, M. Y. (2019). Civil Procedure Law: Lawsuit, Trial, Seizure, Evidence, and Court Decision. Sinar Grafika.

Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Indonesian Civil Procedure Law. Liberty.

Mertokusumo, S. (2013). Symposium Repelita IV: "Notary Function in Development. www.sudiknoartikel.blogspot.com

Miru, A. (2008). Contract Law and Contract Drafting.

Miru, A. (2010). Law of Engagement. Rajawali Press.

Putri, A. A. (2016). Reasons for cassation by the public prosecutor against the verdict of release from all charges in a fraud case (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 251 K/Pid/2015).

R. Subekti, R. T. (1996). Burgerlijk Wetboek. Pradnya Paramita.

R. Subekti, R. T. (2010). Various Agreements. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rahmadhani, F. (2020). The Evidentiary Power of Underhand Deeds that have been Waarmerked Based on Indonesian Legislation. Recital Review, 2(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v2i2.9135

Sirait, G. N. A., & Djaja, B. (2023). Notarial Deed Liability as an Authentic Deed in Accordance with the Notary Position Law. Unes Law Review, 5(4), 3363–3378.

Subekti, R. (2007). Law of Evidence. Pradnya Paramita.

Taliwongso, C. A. A. (2022). The Position of Authentic Deed as Evidence in Civil Trial in Review of Article 1870 of the Civil Code (Case Study of Decision Number 347/Pdt. G/2012/PN. Mdn). Lex Administratum, 10(2).

Wahyuni, S. (2021). The Authority of Notary in Making Deed of Statement Related to General Meeting of Shareholders (RUPS) and its Criminal Liability (Case Study: Banten High Court Decision Number 9/PID/2019/PT. BTN). Otentik's Journal of Notarial Law, 3(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.35814/otentik.v3i2.2418

Downloads

Published

31-07-2025

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.